Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniil Glinka vs Ulises Blanch Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Glinka vs Blanch analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniil Glinka vs Ulises Blanch Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Glinka 1 - 0 Blanch
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Glinka has won 53.06% of points on their second serve, while Blanch has won 48.16%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Glinka, in recent form, has won 52.23% of their opponent's second serve points, while Blanch has won 54.75%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.05% and 31.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Glinka has saved 70.32% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Blanch has saved 68.6% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Glinka has won 61.04% of matches played (W/L 47/ 30), with Blanch winning 64.1% (W/L 25/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Glinka has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 48/ 39), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 26/ 29). Blanch has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 86/ 80).
- Player level: In the last year, Glinka has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.79% of matches (W/L 37/ 21), where as Blanch has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.07% of matches (W/L 18/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Glinka winning 1 times and Blanch being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Glinka winning 2 and Blanch winning 0. The last match between Glinka and Blanch was at the M25 Kachreti, 17-05-2024, Quarterfinals, Hard with Daniil Glinka getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:12:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Glinka and Blanch have played a deciding set 0 times, with Glinka winning 0 times and Blanch 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Glinka winning 0, and Blanch 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Glinka has played against opponents with an average rank of 167.83 while Blanch has played against players with an average rank of 241.9.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Glinka has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Blanch has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Glinka has converted 35.49% of breakpoint opportunities, and Blanch has converted 37.68% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
426
Rank
419
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
458
Rank
236
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
52% (162-148)
Career Total W/L
53% (215-188)
55% (22-18)
YTD W/L
76% (13-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$54,150
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniil Glinka | Ulises Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:12:0 | 1:12:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (35/48) | 62% (29/47) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (27/35) | 69% (20/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (5/13) | 11% (2/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (25/47) | 33% (16/48) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Daniil Glinka
Player
Ulises Blanch
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniil Glinka | Ulises Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (22/18) | 76% (13/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (54/39) | 67% (26/13) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (487/417) | 54% (204/176) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 77% (10/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 75% (3/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (15/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.53 | 0.59 |
| Aces Total | 232 | 109 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.54 |
| DFs Total | 88 | 99 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:24 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 182.45 | 256.24 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1753/2784) | 57% (720/1264) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (1297/1753) | 74% (530/720) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (547/1031) | 48% (262/544) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (104/293) | 38% (52/138) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (1140/2981) | 40% (503/1259) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 42% (5/7) | 75% (6/2) |
| Futures W/L | 61% (17/11) | 78% (7/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (22/40) | 76% (13/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 27% (3/11) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 23% (3/13) | 100% (5/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (28/20) | 100% (12/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (28/8) | 0% (12/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 20% (5/1) |
Daniil Glinka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tiago Pereira
Player
Daniil Glinka
55%
(
63 of
114)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
95)
5
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
55%
(
28 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
38%
(
43 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Daniil Glinka
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Charles Broom
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Yanki Erel
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
13
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
16 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Daniil Glinka
51%
(
43 of
84)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
91%
(
39 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
32%
(
13 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Ulises Blanch
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Robin Bertrand
77%
(
59 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
74
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Orel Kimhi
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Daniil Glinka
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
76%
(
81 of
107)
17
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
51 of
81)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
20 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
107)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Egor Pleshivtsev
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ulises Blanch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Ulises Blanch
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
50%
(
54 of
108)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
11
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Lautaro Midon
49%
(
35 of
72)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Pedro Boscardin Dias
48%
(
27 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
4
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
53%
(
42 of
79)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
3
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Ulises Blanch
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Saba Purtseladze
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
12
Aces
18
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
25 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Ben Jones
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Giorgi Giorgadze
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Ulises Blanch
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
86)
12
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
3
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Glinka Vs Blanch Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Glinka are available here and Blanch photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Daniil Glinka
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
